Hi Jimmy,

Perhaps another solution could be to add an 80m (coaxial) trap to the 160m inverted L. I used this approach when I lived on a small city lot in SC with only a single useful tree. This allowed me to use the same supports, radial field and wire for 80 and 160 meters.

73,
--Alex KR1ST


On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 7:32 PM, james soto via Topband <
topband@contesting.com> wrote:

Actually iam using an inverted L for 160 with few radials.I would like to
build another one for 75 meters band. my questio are:1. How close they
could be? 2. could i use the same radials existing from the 160 inverted
L?Thankskp2bh/jimmy

_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

Reply via email to