I haven't even listened for anything digital in several years. But I need to share some things soon --that K1JT himself told me via email-- concerning JT65 vs JT9 on 160. To make a long story short, I'm no longer 'preaching' against using JT65 in favor of JT9, as I have been in the past. More later; I need to ask and reply to Joe Taylor's last email first.
My main interest in JT* is *occasionally* trying to work DX when the QRN is bad here; perhaps calling CQ using several hundred watts when there's no JT activity in North America. I tried that once or twice 2-3 years ago when I saw JT activity in Australia, and no reply. (Maybe a sked would be better.) I've never heard of JTDX until today. A Google search seems to imply it's fairly new. One person talked about having JTDX incorporated into WSJT-X, but I didn't read it. Personally, I am not at all interested in using digital modes for contesting, WAS, DXCC, or anything like that. 73, Mike www.w0btu.com _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband