I should have stated for the comparison that I have 4 elevated radials under the inverted L W2LL
Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 19, 2020, at 12:49 PM, Joe <n...@mwt.net> wrote: > > An Inverted "L" is more or less a vertical, but the upper half got bent > over correct? > > So a major part of an inverted "L" just as in a regular vertical is the > ground system. > Correct? > > Now how elevated radials work great in a regular vertical, only need like 4 > to equal miles of wire in ground mounted radial field. > > Will elevated radials work for an inverted "L"? > > How about few and shorter than full length elevated radials as in a N6BT > design? > > Joe WB9SBD > <CLEAN-IDLE-TYME-LOGO-120x96.jpg> > > The Original Rolling Ball Clock > Idle Tyme > Idle-Tyme.com > http://www.idle-tyme.com > On 4/19/2020 11:35 AM, daraym...@iowatelecom.net wrote: >> The inverted L will out perform and inverted vee, hands down, 90% of the >> time. The few exceptions will probably be near your local SR (and other >> times) when horizontal polarization can work better. 73. . . >> Dave, W0FLS >> >> -----Original Message----- From: Peter Krulewitch >> Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2020 11:28 AM >> To: topband@contesting.com >> Subject: Topband: Inverted V vs inverted L >> >> Have used inverted L with 90 apex for several years but wonder whether >> comparison tests or experiences with inverted V at that height compares. Tnx >> fer your ideas.W2LL >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> _________________ >> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector >> _________________ >> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector >> > _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector