Jorge
ОК ОК ОК
But I'm not talking about the official approach.
I am familiar with all super RX stations ( 160 м) in zone 16 - RA4LW,
UR0MC, RL3A
A mediocre station UT6UD shows a fantastic result. I drew the attention
of the world community to this.
I especially wanted the founders of CQ WW to better defend this context.
Thanks !
---
Nick, UY0ZG
http://www.topband.in.ua
Jorge Diez - CX6VM писал 2021-12-08 14:05:
Nick
please read the contest rules. No recording for assisted stations.
That's bad, hope recording will be asked for all stations for next
year and make them public, like the logs
73,
Jorge
CX6VM/CW5W
[1]
Libre de virus. www.avast.com [1]
El mié, 8 dic 2021 a las 6:15, uy0zg (<uy...@mksat.net>) escribió:
Hi
I enjoyed listening to the real 160m in Slovenia. Thanks :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uqfbz-LV3pc
How to hear UT6UD sound recording for CQWW CW 2021?
1 UT6UD.............189,42
2 UY0ZG..............70,799
3 UX0KR..............69,012
https://www.cqww.com/rawcat.htm?cat=AH%20160M&cty=UR&mode=cw&call_search=UT6UD
After posting preliminary results, I realized that I participated in
the
kontest without my TX and RX antennas: - ((((((((((((((
I can demonstrate the sound recording of each of my QSOs at CQ WW
CW.
--
Nick, UY0ZG
http://www.topband.in.ua
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
Reflector
--
73,
Jorge
CX6VM/CW5W
[1]
Libre de virus. www.avast.com [1]
Links:
------
[1]
https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector