My guess: This difference is likely the results of decisions made at
the time of receiver design. Here is the question for the designers.
How many bits of digital do we need in the analog to digital conversion,
and also in the digital to analog at the end. The probable conclusion is
that we do not need to digitize anything below the noise floor of the
receiver. There is no information to be recovered there. Adding extra
bits of conversion to accurately digitize the noise floor is a waste. -
just my guess.
The question posed by Tree of how is FT-8 copying signals below the
noise floor is a good one. I suggest you measure it. I did. You will
be surprised.
Jerry, K4SAV
On 2/7/2026 11:19 AM, Tree wrote:
So is the takeaway that the older superhet top line rigs are then the
optimum for 160-meter DX?
I guess this begs a question about FT8. Many people are copying signals
way below the noise level with their DSP radios and FT8. How is that
possible if that signal just isn't there?
Tree N6TR
On Sat, Feb 7, 2026 at 8:08 AM Rick Kunath via Topband <
[email protected]> wrote:
So is the takeaway that the older superhet top line rigs are then the
optimum for 160-meter DX?
Or is there something else about the SDR that wins out?
Ir seems like hearing is what it is all about down here.
And an excellent review, thank you.
Rick Kunath, K9AO
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
Reflector
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
