No, the original issue of untyped resources is not explained by the
import structure, and there are no problem with defining an extra
import statement in the comment header.  This is not the source of
your problems.

For imports the ?model owl:imports <imported-model> is required.
Composer adds an import statement to the comment field to support
scanning files for imports.  This enables efficient processing of
imported files when, for example, changing a base URI that is used by
(imported by) other models.

You can remove the comment with no consequences.  It is superfluous,
but convenient for ontology editing.

In your case, the owl:imports statement was missing.  The commented
imports line will have no impact, and therefore the model was not
imported.

It's always important to let us know when files are hand-edited or
created by some external entity, as this can help us diagnose what the
potential causes of the problem(s) are.

I don't know where we are w.r.t. the original "untypes refs" issue, so
let us know if there are further questions.

-- Scott

On Feb 15, 2:23 pm, "Bohms, H.M. (Michel)" <[email protected]>
wrote:
> If I let tbc add impport to correct I get:
>
> # Saved by TopBraid on Tue Feb 15 21:19:15 CET 2011
> # baseURI:http://www.bimtoolset.org/ontologies/ob.ttl
> # imports:http://www.bimtoolset.org/ontologies/mm.ttl
>
> @prefix :        <http://www.bimtoolset.org/ontologies/ob.ttl#> .
> @prefix mm:      <http://www.bimtoolset.org/ontologies/mm.ttl#> .
> @prefix owl:     <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
> @prefix rdf:     <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
> @prefix rdfs:    <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
> @prefix xsd:     <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
>
> <http://www.bimtoolset.org/ontologies/ob.ttl>
>       rdf:type owl:Ontology ;
>       owl:imports <http://www.bimtoolset.org/ontologies/mm.ttl> ;
>       owl:versionInfo "Created with TopBraid Composer"^^xsd:string .
>
> So it adds BESIDES the:
> # imports:http://www.bimtoolset.org/ontologies/mm.ttl
> Als a line:
>       owl:imports <http://www.bimtoolset.org/ontologies/mm.ttl> ;
>
> Is this the issue and if so: why double?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Group "TopBraid Suite Users", the topics of which include TopBraid Composer,
TopBraid Live, TopBraid Ensemble, SPARQLMotion and SPIN.
To post to this group, send email to
[email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/topbraid-users?hl=en

Reply via email to