Monika,
In the blog, the unit "centimeter" had three types: qudt:DerivedUnit,
qudt:LengthUnit and rdfs:Datatype. Since it had rdfs:Datatype as its
type as well, it was inferred to be a subclass of rdfs:Resource (but
this was not asserted). In the latest ontology, centimeter still keeps
the first two types, but doesn't have rdfs:Datatype as its type any more.
So, the only change between the blog and the latest unit ontology is the
removal of rdfs:Datatype from its types. Centimeter has always been an
individual.
Gokhan
My question was about the unit "centimetre". As per the blog
http://composing-the-semantic-web.blogspot.com/2009/08/units-ontology-with-spin-support.html
it seems Centimetre is a class in the http://qudt.org/1.1/vocab/unit
namespace. However it has been defined as an individual of the "Length
Unit " entity in the actual ontology. I would like to clarify if
things have changed since the blog and Centimetre is in fact an
individual.
Thanks,
Monika
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Group "TopBraid Suite Users", the topics of which include TopBraid Composer,
TopBraid Live, TopBraid Ensemble, SPARQLMotion and SPIN.
To post to this group, send email to
topbraid-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/topbraid-users?hl=en
