Thanks for taking a look, Jim. It's important to have early adopters to
detect problems before things get frozen. BTW I have meanwhile updated
the spec and the TopBraid SHACL API to the new path-based syntax. This
however means that there is a mismatch between TopBraid 5.1 and the
SHACL API. 5.2 will catch up (I think, September time frame).
Holger
On 8/07/2016 6:43, Jim Balhoff wrote:
Hi Holger,
Thanks for explaining this! Maybe I am jumping into SHACL too quickly. :-) But
I think it will be very useful once it is complete.
Best regards,
Jim
On Jul 2, 2016, at 10:23 PM, Holger Knublauch <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Jim,
yes it should work for inverse properties, but the .ttl file currently does not
include a validator (SPARQL query) for that case. I didn't implement that
because this part of the spec had been very unstable. The WG has this week
resolved an outstanding syntax issue which I plan to implement in the coming
week: sh:inverseProperty will be deleted and generalized using sh:path. Then
just a single validator will be needed for the different cases.
Meanwhile, if you need something urgently, you could add the missing validator
in your own copy of the dash.ttl file.
HTH
Holger
On 1/07/2016 1:11, Jim Balhoff wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to use sh:inverseProperty and sh:qualifiedValueShape together in a
SHACL shape. When I try to validate some triples using the SHACL API I get this
output:
[ a <http://datashapes.org/dash#FailureResult> ;
<http://www.w3.org/ns/shacl#message>
"No suitable validator found for constraint" ;
<http://www.w3.org/ns/shacl#sourceConstraint>
_:b0 ;
<http://www.w3.org/ns/shacl#sourceConstraintComponent>
<http://www.w3.org/ns/shacl#QualifiedMaxCountConstraintComponent> ;
<http://www.w3.org/ns/shacl#sourceShape>
<OneBiologicalFatherInverse>
] .
A nearly identical shape that uses sh:property instead of sh:inverseProperty
does work for me. Should this work with sh:inverseProperty? The two shapes and
a tiny data file are here:
https://gist.github.com/balhoff/6bb8edc4e6cca38f800fe21f14a08f8f
Thank you,
Jim
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group "TopBraid
Suite Users", the topics of which include the TopBraid Suite family of products and
its base technologies such as SPARQLMotion, SPARQL Web Pages and SPIN.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
--- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group "TopBraid
Suite Users", the topics of which include the TopBraid Suite family of products and
its base technologies such as SPARQLMotion, SPARQL Web Pages and SPIN.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
