Ahhh, ok perfect! With the earlier issue you asked whether I included the dash import. It seemed to solve the issue then which was after all solved by other changes I guess.
Because I did not really use dash vocab I thought it was needed anyway for some other internal reason. Retried myself and indeed not needed. Thx. Dr. ir. H.M. (Michel) Böhms Senior Data Scientist T +31888663107 M +31630381220 E [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Location<https://www.google.com/maps/place/TNO+-+Locatie+Delft+-+Stieltjesweg/@52.000788,4.3745183,17z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m5!3m4!1s0x47c5b58c52869997:0x56681566be3b8c88!8m2!3d52.000788!4d4.376707> [cid:[email protected]]<http://www.tno.nl/> This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no liability for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic transmission of messages. From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Holger Knublauch Sent: donderdag 26 oktober 2017 02:38 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [topbraid-users] shacl rule inference On 25/10/2017 17:26, Bohms, H.M. (Michel) wrote: Ok, I must be confused with another tool, final one on dash import…could that somehow be implicit in case it’s not used explicitly (as in the example)? Could you help me reproduce this? I tried your example file, removing the owl:import statement. Running inferences still works for me. The API has code to automatically add the missing graph, which should trigger. Holger Dr. ir. H.M. (Michel) Böhms Senior Data Scientist T +31888663107 M +31630381220 E [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Location<https://www.google.com/maps/place/TNO+-+Locatie+Delft+-+Stieltjesweg/@52.000788,4.3745183,17z/data=%213m1%214b1%214m5%213m4%211s0x47c5b58c52869997:0x56681566be3b8c88%218m2%213d52.000788%214d4.376707> [cid:[email protected]]<http://www.tno.nl/> This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no liability for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic transmission of messages. From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Holger Knublauch Sent: woensdag 25 oktober 2017 09:13 To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [topbraid-users] shacl rule inference On 25/10/2017 17:08, Bohms, H.M. (Michel) wrote: Ok, thx! Works as expected now. Gr Michel Ps Small one: I noticed that (rdfs) superclass instance inferencing is ‘automatic’. Was that always the case? Or is that because it was only not in owl where you needed explicit inferencing? (anyway I like it 😊) There have been no changes to these "trivial" inferences for years, as far as I can remember. Holger Dr. ir. H.M. (Michel) Böhms Senior Data Scientist T +31888663107 M +31630381220 E [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Location<https://www.google.com/maps/place/TNO+-+Locatie+Delft+-+Stieltjesweg/@52.000788,4.3745183,17z/data=%213m1%214b1%214m5%213m4%211s0x47c5b58c52869997:0x56681566be3b8c88%218m2%213d52.000788%214d4.376707> [cid:[email protected]]<http://www.tno.nl/> This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no liability for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic transmission of messages. From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Holger Knublauch Sent: woensdag 25 oktober 2017 01:38 To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [topbraid-users] shacl rule inference Hi Michel, see the fixed file attached. Property shapes always require sh:path, so you needed an additional blank node: ruletry:PropertyShape_1 rdf:type sh:PropertyShape ; sh:path [ sh:inversePath ( ruletry:hasRadiator ruletry:size ) ; ] ; sh:hasValue "large" . To enter such things, you can use the SPARQL path surface syntax in TBC at sh:path. I just noticed a bug in the beta here - there should be a (...) around the path expression in this case. I'll see if this can be fixed in time for the final release. [cid:[email protected]] HTH Holger On 25/10/2017 7:45, Bohms, H.M. (Michel) wrote: Hi Holger Hereby slightly updated simple example. (right name spaces/imports/domains/ranges now) Still no inference as expected (a related MyRadiator with size being “big”). I must still be doing something wrong with the inversePath I guess…. (shacl warns me of a missing sh:path so I guess I need a path INVOLVING an inversePath iso an inversePath only?) Thx again, Michel Dr. ir. H.M. (Michel) Böhms Senior Data Scientist T +31888663107 M +31630381220 E [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Location<https://www.google.com/maps/place/TNO+-+Locatie+Delft+-+Stieltjesweg/@52.000788,4.3745183,17z/data=%213m1%214b1%214m5%213m4%211s0x47c5b58c52869997:0x56681566be3b8c88%218m2%213d52.000788%214d4.376707> [cid:[email protected]]<http://www.tno.nl/> This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no liability for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic transmission of messages. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
