Someone proposed the following pattern: ex:Height rdf:type owlClass ; rdfs:subClassOf opm:Property ; prefUnit "m" ; quantityKind cdt:length .
Seems turtlewise ok. Seems rdfwise ok. Guess same as rdfwise.... Seems owlwise not ok...giving properties other than annotation properties to a class. Could it be rdfswise ok...in case of change to rdf:type rdfs:Class? Thx for advice! Datawise it would be very welcome/handy just strugling with the interpretation.... Greetings michel Verzonden van mijn Android-telefoon via TouchDown (www.symantec.com) This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no liability for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic transmission of messages. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
