Despite seen as exotic, still a question on owl2 property chaining.

The functional-style syntax name is ObjectPropertyChain.

In Turtle however called: owl:propertyChainAxiom (NOT: 
owl:objectPropertyChainAxiom)

That's strange, you would expect the second name.
Anyway I now assume that this construct is only valid for object properties.

So my use for property paths ending in a datatype property might be simply 
wrong...

Feedback welcome!
(if true even more reason to shift to shacl....)

Thx Michel






Dr. ir. H.M. (Michel) Böhms
Senior Data Scientist


T +31888663107
M +31630381220
E michel.bo...@tno.nl<mailto:michel.bo...@tno.nl>

Location<https://www.google.com/maps/place/TNO+-+Locatie+Delft+-+Stieltjesweg/@52.000788,4.3745183,17z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m5!3m4!1s0x47c5b58c52869997:0x56681566be3b8c88!8m2!3d52.000788!4d4.376707>



[cid:image001.gif@01D6029F.9C21E150]<http://www.tno.nl/>

This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are 
not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are 
requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no liability 
for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it and for 
damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic 
transmission of messages.









-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/b3ab55b400904e3980a8cf2b08c83d31%40tno.nl.

Reply via email to