To add to what Holger said, this is the reason sh:name exists. If this was the label of the property shape, then there would be no need to define a new property. One could simply use rdfs:label - as Holger’s example shows.
Sh:name was created because it is not the label of the resource that is the subject of the sh:name triples. Instead, it is a display label for the path. > On Jul 8, 2021, at 9:34 PM, Holger Knublauch <hol...@topquadrant.com> wrote: > > I don't agree on that and believe your use of sh:name does not align with how > the standard intended it to be used. sh:name is supposed to be the display > label for the property, e.g. "owns" and not the label of the property shape. > The label of the property shape should be in rdfs:label, like you would do it > for node shapes. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/47B2E936-0AA8-46BF-82E0-E0DF31F20156%40topquadrant.com.
