Thanks Holger All good Re the design of the tagger. Makes sense.
Regarding the auto-generated proxy taxonomy you mentioned, we utilise proxying graph loading methods now too. In our process, I would configure a new "managed graph" via our manifest loader that proxies the global taxonomy in a new taxonomy that stores the dash hidden triples as you also suggest. This would require the additional graph management setup in our method which is fine but I wonder if you mean there is another in-built or sparql/dash/swp EDG method? If you're envisaged process uses a different mechanism it would be good to know more. Cheers mate Simon On Wednesday, November 17, 2021 at 7:41:44 PM UTC+11 Holger Knublauch wrote: > Hi Simon, > > I think the behavior that you describe works as-designed. The tag set > graph is only supposed to contain the mappings, while the display of the > tags queries the taxonomy only and therefore won't see any dash:hidden > triples that you may have "smuggled" into the tag set graph. (Pro tip: you > can actually see which graph the Add Tags panel queries if you look at the > Network monitor of Chrome's dev tools - that's not the union of all graphs). > > The only solution that I see is to create another intermediate Taxonomy > that includes/owl:imports the original Taxonomy but adds the dash:hidden > triples that you need here. Such an intermediate/proxy taxonomy could > potentially be auto-generated. > > Holger > > > On 2021-11-17 1:35 pm, Simon Opper wrote: > > Hi all > > In a tagset I want to hide certain skos resources , primarily > conceptschemes, but it appears that the code that renders the tagger panel > does not respect dash:hidden in all cases. > > It looks there are two behaviours occurring: > > 1. if the scheme is declared as hidden in the included source taxonomy -> > it is hidden in the tagger panel > 2. if the scheme is declared hidden in the tagset graph -> the panel *does > not* respect this and still shows the scheme. > > Is this intended ? > > behaviour 1. does not give me the desired solution as I wish to hide > certain schemes *only* in the tagset and I do not want to declare it as > hidden in the source taxonomy. > > is there a workaround ? > > [image: local hidden not respected.png] > > [image: included hidden is repected.png] > > Many thanks in advance > > Cheers > > Simon > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "TopBraid Suite Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/ea405382-79ec-4ccc-95bd-336d362d8346n%40googlegroups.com > > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/ea405382-79ec-4ccc-95bd-336d362d8346n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/b942ac7f-754d-4880-9519-aa9df0d3a5f1n%40googlegroups.com.
