Brad,

The ModelExplorer view is not the place to see requirements.
Two views are dedicated to the management of requirement :

-          In "Upstream requirement" view, you will see the upstream 
requirements contained in the .requirement model you have associated to your 
model

-          In "Current requirement" view, you can see the links between 
upstream requirements and model elements : the structure corresponds to the 
model structure and you see CurrentRequirements under the model elements they 
are attached to.

If you have Upstream requirements inside the "Upstream requirement" view, it 
means the requirement model is correctly linked to your model.

Best regards,
Anne

De : [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] De la part de Topcased user 
list where issues are discussed
Envoyé : vendredi 27 janvier 2012 16:04
À : [email protected]
Objet : Re: [Topcased-users] Usage of getRequirementProject(EObject) in the 
requirement bundle

Thanks Anne,

But there is still something I must be overlooking. I attached the requirements 
to my model following the procedures in the Requirements Tutorial but I guess I 
don't know to what element in my model they have been attached to.

Using the following produced no results.

<config> <drop/>

<param key='projectName' value='JEESG'/><drop/>

<param key='project' value='${workspace_loc}\${projectName}'/><drop/>

<param key='model' value='${project}\Models\${projectName}.uml'/><drop/>

<output path='${project}/Generated/requirements_output.docx'/><drop/>

</config><drop/>

<drop/>

<context model='${model}' importedBundles='gmf;papyrus;requirement' 
searchMetamodels='true'/>
<gendoc> <drop/>

All Upstream requirements :
[for(req:ttm::Requirement | 
self.getRequirementProject().upstreamModel.documents.children.oclAsType(ttm::Requirement))]
[req.ident/]
[/for]

</gendoc><drop/>

So they are not attached to the topmost Model element. The Model Explorer View 
offers no clues as to which element they might be attached to. If I have linked 
the requirements to my model properly should this work? Or is there something 
I've done wrong linking the requirements to my model?

Thanks for your help.

Brad
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 7:59 AM, Topcased user list where issues are discussed 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> 
wrote:
Hi Brad,

The getRequirementProject() method is called from an element of your UML/SysML 
model that has an attached requirement model.
It is used to access the full requirement model : RequirementProject is the top 
element of this metamodel, thus you have to know the requirement meta-model in 
order to use this method correctly.

For example,  from a RequirementProject, you can get full list of Upstream 
requirements for the current UML model with the following code :
<gendoc>
All Upstream requirements :
[for(req:ttm::Requirement | 
self.getRequirementProject().upstreamModel.documents.children.oclAsType(ttm::Requirement))]
[req.ident/]
[/for]
</gendoc>


Best regards,
Anne


De : 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
 
[mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
 De la part de Topcased user list where issues are discussed
Envoyé : jeudi 26 janvier 2012 18:59
À : [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Objet : [Topcased-users] Usage of getRequirementProject(EObject) in the 
requirement bundle

Two part question really -
1. on what EObject in the model is this method used on? So I have a model in 
which I have associated external requirements and I see them in the  Upstream 
Requirement view. I can drag them to model components or Current Requirements 
view and all is well. But I can't really tell from the Model Explorer view (or 
any other way) what object in the model the RequirementProject is associated 
with so I'm not really sure on what object in my model this call should be made.
2. According to the tutorial this method returns a RequirementProject object. 
How does one then make use of this?

Any help would be appreciated. An example that produces upstream requirements 
for a model in which they have been associated would be ideal.

Thanks in advance.

Brad
________________________________


Ce message et les pièces jointes sont confidentiels et réservés à l'usage 
exclusif de ses destinataires. Il peut également être protégé par le secret 
professionnel. Si vous recevez ce message par erreur, merci d'en avertir 
immédiatement l'expéditeur et de le détruire. L'intégrité du message ne pouvant 
être assurée sur Internet, la responsabilité du groupe Atos ne pourra être 
engagée quant au contenu de ce message. Bien que les meilleurs efforts soient 
faits pour maintenir cette transmission exempte de tout virus, l'expéditeur ne 
donne aucune garantie à cet égard et sa responsabilité ne saurait être engagée 
pour tout dommage résultant d'un virus transmis.

This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for 
the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, 
please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be 
secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the 
message content. Although the sender endeavors to maintain a computer 
virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is 
virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus 
transmitted.

_______________________________________________
Topcased-users mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.gforge.enseeiht.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/topcased-users

_______________________________________________
Topcased-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.enseeiht.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/topcased-users

Reply via email to