#23243: write a spec for web-server-access log descriptors
-----------------------------+------------------------------
 Reporter:  iwakeh           |          Owner:  metrics-team
     Type:  enhancement      |         Status:  needs_review
 Priority:  Medium           |      Milestone:
Component:  Metrics/Website  |        Version:
 Severity:  Normal           |     Resolution:
 Keywords:                   |  Actual Points:
Parent ID:                   |         Points:
 Reviewer:                   |        Sponsor:
-----------------------------+------------------------------

Comment (by iwakeh):

 Replying to [comment:30 karsten]:
 > Did you mean #22836 above, or some other ticket?

 Yes, you guessed correctly.  I removed my comment on the wrong ticket and
 added it to #22983.

 >
 > Regarding the timing of asking for feedback, I could see us sending the
 request now or later. Do you think the implementation will reveal any
 important changes that would require sending an updated request for
 feedback? If not, we could send now (well, tomorrow). But we could as well
 wait a few more days or even a week if we have to.

 True, then just wait and add this topic to the team meeting.
 The changes could go in both directions, i.e., changes to the spec could
 need implementation changes.  But, very likely these will be small.

 >
 > When we ask for feedback, should we simply put what we have on the
 Metrics website together with a visible "beta" notice? Might be easier
 than sending out a PDF.

 This is the best way to go about this.  Maybe also add a link to the
 metrics mailing list on the beta-page for questions and concerns, in case
 user without a tor-dev-ml subscription view the page.

--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/23243#comment:32>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs

Reply via email to