#23764: hs-v3: No live consensus on client with a bridge -------------------------------------------------+------------------------- Reporter: dgoulet | Owner: dgoulet Type: defect | Status: new Priority: High | Milestone: Tor: | unspecified Component: Core Tor/Tor | Version: Severity: Normal | Resolution: Keywords: tor-hs, prop224, | Actual Points: 034-triage-20180328, 034-removed-20180328 | Parent ID: #23605 | Points: Reviewer: | Sponsor: -------------------------------------------------+------------------------- Changes (by dgoulet):
* status: needs_revision => new * sponsor: Sponsor8-can => Comment: I'm gonna go on a limb here and say that this is a bit "out of scope" in some ways or just too complicated for s8 at this stage. I've gone over the thread above (which is kind of old, things have changed a bit since then) and what I can say is that the changes would need to happen in many places and thus require us to expand considerably our reachability unit testing. First in `can_client_refetch_desc()` to let the client try to download a descriptor without a live consensus. The second big part would be in `hs_get_responsible_hsdirs()` which also requires a live consensus but also used by the service ... so some split to be done. Then finaly, make `hs_get_time_period_num()` maybe fallback on the "latest consensus" instead of `approx_time()` if the live consensus can't be found. The idea here is that for the whole subsystem the same time source has to be used. So having code path that use the "latest consensus valid_after" time with approx_time is a recipe for reachability issue. We had so many issues with timing over the years and ended up realizing that whatever we use, the entire subsystem needs to use the same time source. In theory, right now, the "live consensus valid_after" should be used across the board. Part of my thinks we would benefit from a "HS time source" that is updated every time we get a new consensus and then the HS subsystem only uses. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/23764#comment:13> Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/> The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________ tor-bugs mailing list tor-bugs@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs