#12631: Tor Browser for ARM architecture --------------------------------------+------------------------ Reporter: mttp | Owner: (none) Type: project | Status: new Priority: Medium | Milestone: Component: Applications/Tor Browser | Version: Severity: Normal | Resolution: Keywords: tbb-rbm | Actual Points: Parent ID: | Points: Reviewer: | Sponsor: --------------------------------------+------------------------
Comment (by gk): Replying to [comment:21 gk]: > Replying to [comment:20 JeremyRand]: > > Updated my rbm descriptors for ARM to work with ESR 60. https://notabug.org/JeremyRand/tor-browser-build/src/armhf-esr60 (the armhf-esr60 branch). Docs still at https://wiki.raptorcs.com/wiki/Porting/Tor_Browser . One noteworthy thing is that, due to what is probably https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1452128 , I needed to upgrade to gcc 7.3.0 / binutils 2.29.1. I don't know if that's a dealbreaker for Tor (and I haven't carefully tested whether the upgrade breaks anything on non-ARM platforms). Can anyone from Tor comment on whether the specific gcc / binutils versions used by Tor Browser were chosen for a particular reason, and whether upgrading them would be considered if it's the most straightforward way to get ARM to work? > > Thanks for working on the ARM port, really appreciated! Updating GCC to 7.3.0 is probably no problem. That's now #29335 and will happen in a couple of weeks once we start with the 9.0 alpha series and is the last missing piece as we already bumped binutils to 2.31.1. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/12631#comment:23> Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/> The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________ tor-bugs mailing list tor-bugs@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs