#29136: PT_LOG and PT_STATUS event fields unspecifed ------------------------------+------------------------------------ Reporter: atagar | Owner: atagar Type: defect | Status: needs_revision Priority: High | Milestone: Tor: 0.4.0.x-final Component: Core Tor/Tor | Version: Severity: Normal | Resolution: Keywords: tor-spec, tor-pt | Actual Points: Parent ID: | Points: Reviewer: ahf | Sponsor: Sponsor19-can ------------------------------+------------------------------------
Comment (by teor): Replying to [comment:26 atagar]: > Hi Alex. Is there a ticket for implementing PT_STATUS? If so then this spec patch should either await it (if PT_STATUS's merge is imminent), or we should remove PT_STATUS until it's ready. > > Maybe I'm missing something but it sounds like a mistake to spec or reserve the keyword for something that doesn't exist. Doing so risks that five years from now someone will ask "What is this PT_STATUS thing?" and the answer will be "something we started to spec out but never got around to". > > Better to merge and spec PT_STATUS after it's done. :) We have reserved cell types and protocol versions before, and then never implemented them. atagar is right: if it is proposed, it belongs in a proposal. If it's in tor, it belongs in the spec. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/29136#comment:29> Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/> The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________ tor-bugs mailing list tor-bugs@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs