#33076: Graph onionperf and consensus information from Rob's experiments -------------------------------------------------+------------------------- Reporter: mikeperry | Owner: | metrics-team Type: task | Status: | needs_review Priority: Medium | Milestone: Component: Metrics/Analysis | Version: Severity: Normal | Resolution: Keywords: metrics-team-roadmap-2020Q1, sbws- | Actual Points: roadmap | Parent ID: #33121 | Points: Reviewer: | Sponsor: -------------------------------------------------+------------------------- Changes (by karsten):
* status: needs_revision => needs_review Comment: Replying to [comment:13 mikeperry]: > Hrmm. The consensus graphs now all look good, but the votes are a real mystery. It almost looks like only 25% of relays are being measured in these votes? > > Do 75% of relays in the network really have a 1.0 value for 1000 * measured / min_rate_observed (ie measured = min_rate_observed/1000)? > > Or are the votes scales differently, and we're just clipping because upper end of the range is much greater than 1.0 for votes? The issue was that I used the `Bandwidth` value from both consensuses and votes, where I should have used the `Measured` value from votes. That also explains why the graphs were the same for all authorities. Fixed [https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/attachment/ticket/33076/cdf- relay-utilization-and-stream-capacity-2020-02-04.pdf here]. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/33076#comment:16> Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/> The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________ tor-bugs mailing list tor-bugs@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs