On 6/18/12 11:24 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote: > PARTIALLY IMPLEMENTED IN 0.2.3.x > > 186 Multiple addresses for one OR or bridge > > We've implemented this to the extent of letting a bridge have a > single IPv6 address. Supporting this for regular relays will > need to wait for 0.2.4.x. We're still deciding on whether it's > worthwhile to allow more than one IPv4 and one IPv6 address. > > (Proposal by Nick Mathewson, revised based on extensive feeback > by Roger Dingledine and Linus Nordberg.)
This maybe very important in order to be able to "separate" the local-address from the IP address published / announced. It maybe valuable, very valuable, if for a specific single node i would be able to add-up even 100 IP:Port pair, then using "third party system" to redirect inbound sockets to that 100 IP:Port to the main one. I mean, an IP:Port can also not be listening on the specific node but also represent a remote tcp-port-forwarder that is forwarding incoming TCP socket to the node OR's port. It would be very interesting if this kind of setup could be done. -naif _______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev