On 10/6/12, Mike Perry <mikepe...@torproject.org> wrote: > Yet still, as Roger and Robert point out, there are some serious > questions about the viability of decentralized directory/consensus > systems. Or, at least questions that sexified attack papers can make to > seem serious. (For example: I don't believe TorSK was actually broken > beyond Tor's current properties...).
Torsk relied on a trusted party to sign relay descriptors. Its goal was to reduce the (asymptotic) total amount of directory communication, not to remove the need for directory authorities. Robert Ransom _______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
