On 28 Sep 2014, at 16:33, Tom Ritter <t...@ritter.vg> wrote: > On 28 September 2014 07:00, Sebastian Hahn <sebast...@torproject.org> wrote: >> This analysis doesn't make much sense, I'm afraid. We use compression >> on the wire, so repeating flags as human-readable strings has a much >> lower overhead than you estimate, for example. Re-doing your estimates >> with actually compressed consensuses might make sense, but probably >> you'll see a lot less value. > > All of those numbers were after compressing the consensus document > using xz, which is the best compression method I know.
sorry, I completely missed that you showed compressed numbers. Interesting results! _______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
