-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 05/20/2015 04:36 AM, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) - lists wrote: > > > On 5/19/15 4:43 PM, Jeremy Rand wrote: >> Hello Tor-Dev, >> >> One of the criticisms of Namecoin which seems to be raised >> sometimes is that the current domain namespace spec doesn't have >> a method for a .bit domain owner to prove that they are in >> control of a .onion. (This is also an issue for .bit domains that >> point to .i2p.) I'm interested in improving this situation, and >> am looking for feedback. > > At Tor2web we've been considering using Namecoin for those > features: > > https://github.com/globaleaks/Tor2web/issues/30 > https://github.com/globaleaks/Tor2web/issues/66 > > If someone want to hack on those feature, we'd love to support! :)
Ah cool, thanks for the heads up; I wasn't aware that Tor2web was looking at that use case. Good to see that there's interest there. Cheers, - -Jeremy -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJVXahkAAoJEAHN/EbZ1y06IDkP/10y0K27UZgFfUiKdxuCz0Lo jCYo5HwjD3usluF1nIpMnN29za1HtiqbRPkHmYnXVAx4L9hESB9oyw+2lS0XxDBu ZmncPhSJR/KTo8HJ3T7DbQsWqXzqUaaxuNCSYJKVRdZLejV6GDVJ57Fy2XlJTQ7p lQitFASjoH+2uhRa6a6DtHHXCph9LxCo6zvjA0CowEjDWaQYWuYyeL+uDz2bEr4X Q12t0PYoYFamz2i/3yzg39pyWJN16k7Qmi13DPkQiM2bB4/jNWej471DtZ0dE+KN dd9bM2srxfQVV/bd4LAB2OFo/zy3PPuAe/VenuZ4gSaW0QZfGEn4Vc09KvxnVFtD 19joxzOsAfvJ+Lk0ma+X7hy/m5G62RLLrcu7m2+4B27GXIVH8mTTx9ooyUDvYeBM sh0K8XtnTRivXmalg0BvPcVJnOIXD+p22N8mF5CXbBgjfKbKMFZYa6Cb+DNZmwPd eh/Llb/a4ktS4oo4hy8xZpE0cBGsuTWoomrZK3mFYBmPDggLvzUevUj3TAfIuyWZ exnVw9ELruIX85K9h/vXF2LxYAyTWyfd5x9mXVeB71KZnUi74NmKL38FcLtZNMTT OYztzK4FLl2FGcvYKGgdCBmwWB/yPFJBjzHk0HX9cI624IFD4Oh/Ok50oU18Szgg xG4BEtWm9OwtpEnzY3Nm =Ed/X -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev