On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 12:05:49AM +0800, Li Xiaodong wrote: > Hello, thank you very much for your help. I really appreciate it. In this > afternoon of China Time, I found a obfs4 bridge which is usable in China. The > speed of Tor Browser connecting with obfs4 bridge, and the speed of Tor > Browser > connecting with Meek Azure, which is faster? It is more difficult for China's > firewall to block I2P. If Tor can learn some strong points of I2P in future, > Tor can work better in China. Thank you very much for your help. I really > appreciate it. All the best with your work. Good luck in all that you will > achieve.
Most likely, obfs4 will be faster than meek-azure. Especially after tomorrow, when I will slow down meek-azure to reduce costs. See: https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/2015-September/009533.html If you know some details of how I2P resists blocking, please add them to this wiki page: https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/PluggableTransports To edit the wiki you can create an account: https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/register Or use the shared cypherpunks/writecode account. _______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev