On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 01:38:56PM -0500, David Goulet wrote: > Anyway, if you think this algorithm could be improved, please respond. If you > think this algorithm is wrong, please respond. If you can reproduce the result > on your own with this algo, omg please respond! :) The above could be totally > wrong but hopefully we did a fairly good job. Please remember, this is an > estimate. :)
I would be interested to see the capacity by pluggable transport: how much headroom each PT has and which ones need more bridges. I tried it a few months ago but I didn't have the idea of looking at the read/write bytes history. I tried using measured/advertised bandwidth and using the speed of consensus downloads from the dirreq-v3-tunneled-dl line. [tor-dev] Per-transport bridge bandwidth and bridge counts https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/2015-July/009136.html Using measured bandwidth: https://people.torproject.org/~dcf/graphs/pt-bandwidth-2015-07-20/pt-bandwidth.png Using median dirreq-v3-tunneled-dl rate: https://people.torproject.org/~dcf/graphs/pt-bandwidth-2015-07-20/pt-dl.md.png Source code: https://people.torproject.org/~dcf/graphs/pt-bandwidth-2015-07-20.tar.gz _______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev