Hello Jason,

thanks for reporting back.

> I'm writing on behalf of MaxMind. We believe we have addressed the issues
> you noted in the latest update of our GeoLite ASN database:
> http://dev.maxmind.com/geoip/legacy/geolite/#Downloads.
> 
> Thank you for bringing the issues to our attention.

I just downloaded the current version of GeoIPASNum2.zip
(SHA1: c72a275c66cededf47157e3cea4625342b85bf94)
to have a short look at it and I'm not sure the problem is fixed completely.

While the number of unnamed AS entries significantly improved (unnamed
count is down to 1462 from >57k, still not back to ~500 (Feb 2016), but
just comparing absolute numbers without considering total entries in
each CSV might be a bit flawed metric anyway),
incorrect AS names apparently remain:

I searched for the two examples I gave in my last email:

AS8708 and AS12741
they are still incorrectly named "73-75 Dr. Staicovici" and "Warszawa
02-822" in your DB, which means the problem still persists.

actual names:
http://bgp.he.net/AS8708
http://bgp.he.net/AS12741


thank you for looking into this again,
nusenu

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev

Reply via email to