> > Actually, we should have a simple format like "ed25519:<base64_key>" instead > so then in 5 years, if we end up with 10 different authorization method, we > can just pass "key:value" argument at will to the torrc option. >
To be better, I prefer "ed25519:private:<base64_key>" >> >> Some more things to do: >> - Rename "./client_authorized" to "./authorized_clients"? > > +1 +1 >> - What's the "auth-type"? I assume standard. > > We could use "descriptor" even though it won't stay much to a regular user, it > will at least have a semantic for power users. Because even "standard" for > regular user will probably mean nothing... ? +1
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev