On 08.01.2013, at 20:51, Moritz Bartl <mor...@torservers.net> wrote:
> Hi Micah, > > On 08.01.2013 19:47, Micah Lee wrote: >> FYI, I just discovered a VPS provider DigitalOcean, and they seem fine >> with people running non-exit nodes: > > Thanks for the hint. In general, I don't see why VPS providers would not > allow internal Tor relaying, and I would not even bother to ask first. > Interesting values to know about VPS providers are bandwidth allowance > ("unlimited" is quite obviously a marketing term; often, limits can only > be discovered by some months of experience) and [socket/numfile] > limitations. Support is often reluctant to provide such values before > ordering. A good way to characterize VPS offers is to post the output of > "cat /proc/user_beancounters". that seems to only exist on OpenVZ but not on fully virtualized hosts. > > -- > Moritz Bartl > https://www.torservers.net/ > _______________________________________________ > tor-relays mailing list > tor-relays@lists.torproject.org > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays