Hi grarpamp. Actually we do have a rudimentary Sybil checker and it *did* pick up on those relays back in January...
https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-consensus-health/2014-January/003954.html We had some internal discussions about them but the thread lost momentum before they were flagged. This is a large part of the motivation for why Philipp and I are taking over responsibility for this... https://blog.torproject.org/blog/how-report-bad-relays https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/ReportingBadRelays Previously it wasn't truly maintained by anyone so bad relay reports got dropped on the floor. Cheers! -Damian On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 11:10 AM, grarpamp <grarp...@gmail.com> wrote: > As a project then to production development, someone should go back > through the entire history of descriptors and look for groups coming online... > dates, IP's, contacts, tor/OS versions, nicknames, ISP's, geoip, numbers > coming online over sliding timeframes, correlation to 'news events', etc. > There may be more questionable relays to be found. > We were talking about such influxes around july 4 09, ironically, or not. > -- > tor-talk mailing list - tor-t...@lists.torproject.org > To unsubscribe or change other settings go to > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
