-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Hi nusenu,
Again thanks for keeping an eye on things. At least partially, the balance of measured/unmeasured should be fixed in the new few days. To relay operators, in the mean time, please bare for few more days and sorry for the inconvenience, I can imagine what it feels like to have a high capacity unmeasured relay. Developers already know that a new bandwidth measurement system is badly needed, just need to find workarounds for the short term until such a system will be ready. On 5/19/2015 12:02 AM, nusenu wrote: > now even DocTor starts to complain > > https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-consensus-health/2015-May/0 05772.html > > _______________________________________________ > tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVWlkwAAoJEIN/pSyBJlsRPUEH/3x9638bl0mSoq2oEpC3MazV GgCEh/MG+6dWDKdASG0qdrpdFPt4VrihuwhIOB5l5G9x6RUhf1LEZvGjdqYiyz0Y JRB1m4Mek8x0iHKeVQeY8VnWX3WQBEpgXc4EVUHgkTGXZByLSAueyYnviD0hGeiy ftfaBhN6SE5nzxAVBmzHBiC5rmFl5cam3o9YxguGOkugaWeLHgHDECbQ+yjacy1N 6VjudnuuFeAu2myfo6g2W7tCHswVaDwqyUhmhuab9OUguImv0HdHoGgeJM/tn3TZ EQuRSKYV4jhfCkzpcLvzcsueJKuLfchGyJ8JxiD/vbLuXe9swLJsUcwORg4BMQQ= =w3+J -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays