Windows has a very significant percentage of the server market share, and more 
attention should be focused on this part of the Tor Server development. Right 
now, it’s a very complicated install/config on a Windows OS which is 
disappointing and prevents greater adoption (the end goal of Tor is greater 
adoption to increase privacy). Windows sysadmin aren’t used to tweaking config 
files and the posted documentation isn’t good (repeated requested for me to 
update have gone unanswered). If donating to the project to promote Tor on 
Windows existed, I would. I have been donating to EFF for many years, but 
decided more “action” was needed. I still donate to them.

Also, I’m a member of EFF, so maybe you didn’t understand my email since I 
don’t know what you meant by “throw a shade”. EFF is not related to Tor, so I 
think you’re a bit confused on that. EFF is focused on electronic freedoms 
(e.g. free speech, fair use, privacy, etc) and they’ve been promoting people 
(what I’ve seen in the USA) to adopt and add Tor relays (hence I added Tor 
relays (middle + exit). EFF and Tor are not connected. EFF is merely promoting 
Tor relay adoption.

https://www.eff.org/torchallenge/

-Ben

From: Magnus Hedemark [mailto:magnus.hedem...@protonmail.ch]
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 8:33 AM
To: Ben Serebin; tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] How to Run High Capacity Tor Relays

I think it's unfair to characterize the Tor community as a Linux club, or 
religious about operating systems. There is a whole big world of operating 
systems out there, and most (not all) have a very POSIX flavor to them that 
makes it pretty easy to generalize advice on running the service. The work that 
I'm doing right now is around packaging Tor for OmniOS (and writing doc around 
using them together), which is pretty obscure and has no relationship to Linux. 
There's definitely software out there that assumes you're building it on Linux, 
running it on Linux, but Tor is definitely not one of them.

Windows is the only really prominent OS that I can think of off the top of my 
head that has no significant POSIX flavor to it. Its heritage is more from DOS 
and VMS than anything. It's an odd bird for people who otherwise work in POSIX 
platforms all of the time. Be thankful Tor runs there at all. Supporting 
Windows on a cross-platform app is no small feat.

Maybe instead of throwing shade at the EFF, take a stab at fixing the problem 
yourself? The EFF is not some multi-billion dollar software company, isn't 
staffed with an army of engineers and tech writers looking for something to do. 
And, if they were, I've got doubts that the cost/benefit analysis on supporting 
Windows as a relay platform would turn out in your favor.

If you're really dedicated to running a big Tor relay, and can't be bothered to 
help improve the documentation for Windows relay operators, time to learn a new 
tool and maybe not be so religious about running Windows for all the things? I 
think I've got 5 different OS's that I'm managing right now. No big deal. 
That's the beauty of the other side of the Windows fence. Once you learn one, 
it's easy to learn the rest.

-M

Sent from ProtonMail<https://protonmail.ch>, encrypted email based in 
Switzerland.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] How to Run High Capacity Tor Relays
Time (GMT): Jul 22 2015 12:14:56
From: b...@reefsolutions.com<mailto:b...@reefsolutions.com>
To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org<mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org>

Robert: you're right. The group in general isn't very knowledge about Windows. 
I'm a Windows sysadmin and spent a long time deciphering the Tor documentation 
on windows and it's poor. Best info was another operator who posted on the 
mailing list months ago. I've reached out to the website maintainers and gotten 
radio silence on updating the Wiki for Windows. I've added other things to the 
wiki though (on exits). I'm a bit perplexed on the OS religiousness since we 
need more inclusive for Tor relays. We need a status of liberty, and the EFF's 
push isn't enough.

Sigh....
-Ben

-----Original Message-----
From: tor-relays [mailto:tor-relays-boun...@lists.torproject.org] On Behalf Of I
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 8:29 PM
To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org<mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org>
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] How to Run High Capacity Tor Relays

Moritz and all,

I mean no offence to anyone since we're all in this for the greater good, but 
really approaching joining the Tor community is pretty hard if you are not a 
Linux wiz and know about servers or a number of other things.

I have tried to look around the multitude of interconnecting links but a lot 
are out of sync slightly or are not clear because of presumed knowledge and 
understanding or are irrelevant because of evolution

Wouldn't it be better to be clear and neat in the way Torservers guides are?
Would someone presume the Torproject installation guide was not complete and 
know where to look?

Robert


> On 07/22/2015 01:34 AM, I wrote:
>> https://www.torservers.net/wiki/setup/server has excellent guidance
>> for setting-up relays seriously.
>> Would those at Torproject think about linking to it from their
>> installation guides?
>>
>> Robert
>
> https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/TorExitGuidelines
> links to it, as well as to
> https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/TorRelaySecurity .
> Both these pages could use some overhaul, but they're not too bad.
>
> --
> Moritz Bartl


_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org<mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org>
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org<mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org>
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Reply via email to