> On 16 Dec 2015, at 01:43, Schokomilch NOC <n...@schokomil.ch> wrote: > > Monday we received their usual spam about our exit-node sending spam, and of > course instead of implementing the TorDNSEL on their sites, they rather want > us to block a whole /24 range. > > Anyhow, one line caught our eyes: > > "Tor: Please note as the abuse from Tor has gotten out of hand, we do not > give free passes to abuse coming from Tor exits. See the leader board linked > below for more details on the issue." > > They also include a link to some fancy unresolved abuse ranking[1]. > ... > I think that having a tiny bit less than 1/4 of all abuse reports originating > from Tor is a pretty great value and not "out of hand" at all.
You also have to scroll down their list for a long time before finding any "onion with sunglasses" symbols. Tim Tim Wilson-Brown (teor) teor2345 at gmail dot com PGP 968F094B teor at blah dot im OTR CAD08081 9755866D 89E2A06F E3558B7F B5A9D14F
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
