> On 18 Dec 2015, at 06:03, starlight.201...@binnacle.cx wrote: > > Relay 'Binnacle' experienced outages due to a > loose fiber-option junction in the overhead > wires that has been repaired. I believe > it would make the list if not for this > and do not foresee further trouble. > ... > Available if desired. Can configure IPv6 > on the HE tunnel here if helpful.
Once clients start bootstrapping over IPv6[0], more IPv6 fallback directories and relays would be helpful. But I don't know enough about IPv6 tunnels in general and Hurricane Electric in particular to know whether a tunnel is advisable for a tor relay. I think if a client is just using it for bootstrap, any extra latency shouldn't be an issue. But IPv6 clients may also pick it as a guard, so that should be taken into account. Should we be running relays over IPv6 tunnels? Tim [0]: We're working on it in https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/17840 <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/17840> Tim Wilson-Brown (teor) teor2345 at gmail dot com PGP 968F094B teor at blah dot im OTR CAD08081 9755866D 89E2A06F E3558B7F B5A9D14F
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays