On 12.09.17 23:43, Roman Mamedov wrote: > > I take it you're being ironic? > > Guess I failed at doing that well, if you had to clarify. (Or maybe > you didn't read my entire message.)
I did read it. Just the pitfalls of non-verbal communication, and I'm also not a native English speaker. ;-) > Running your own authoritative nameservers is laudable as well, but the > current discussion is about recursive resolvers. You know, the likes of > 8.8.8.8 and the ones your ISP runs for their clients "to reduce traffic". If you read *my* messages in this thread, you'll find that I am fully aware of this. I even mentioned Google's infamous resolver by IP. :-) I came across one ISP so far which does not provide resolvers for their customers but points resolv.conf to Google's servers. Not good. > Note that 'dnsmasq' won't do, that's just a caching proxy to a fixed > set of a few upstream DNS resolvers; you need 'unbound' which IS a full > independent DNS resolver itself. Yeah, I use Unbound and BIND myself, with the former of course being much more frugal in terms of resource requirements. Easy to set up, too. -Ralph _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays