Definitely be careful, though, especially if they’re from the same hosting provider account. It will increase the chance of receiving an abuse report: and if someone is using Tor to attack and your exits are all picked then that chance just unfortunately increased. It would be a shame to get your nodes instant terminated in that event. Be careful ;)
> On Sep 22, 2017, at 2:55 PM, John Ricketts <j...@quintex.com> wrote: > > Thanks Tim, this is the general idea of “If you build it they will come.” > > I simply don’t want to be a risk. > > John > > On Sep 22, 2017, at 08:19, teor <teor2...@gmail.com > <mailto:teor2...@gmail.com>> wrote: > >> >>> On 22 Sep 2017, at 23:04, John Ricketts <j...@quintex.com >>> <mailto:j...@quintex.com>> wrote: >>> >>> All, >>> >>> I have brought this question up in meetings in Seattle and other places so >>> some of you may have already heard me ask this question. So, at risk of >>> repeating the question for some... here goes. >>> >>> I am about to fire up more Exit Relays and if I do so I will jump from my >>> roughly 3% of Exit Probability to what technically could easily reach 6-8%. >>> >>> I would like to know everyone’s opinion on having an individual operator >>> have that much exit share. In my case, all the traffic would be coming >>> from the same AS as well, but distributed over four different cities with >>> different upstream carriers. >>> >>> Please chime in, if I get the a green light from the discussion it will >>> happen within a month. >> >> Thank you for supporting Tor! >> And thank you for asking in advance. >> >> More exit relays are good, and we should encourage people who want to >> help the network. >> >> This is a reminder that we need more exit operators, running more large >> exits. If we think your exit share is a problem, the best way to make >> that problem go away is to add other exits. >> >> We're also working on better geographic diversity in bandwidth >> authorities, and this may cause relay weights to shift a bit. So that's >> another way we could end up resolving this issue :-) >> >> T >> >> -- >> Tim Wilson-Brown (teor) >> >> teor2345 at gmail dot com >> PGP C855 6CED 5D90 A0C5 29F6 4D43 450C BA7F 968F 094B >> ricochet:ekmygaiu4rzgsk6n >> xmpp: teor at torproject dot org >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> tor-relays mailing list >> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org> >> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays >> <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays> > _______________________________________________ > tor-relays mailing list > tor-relays@lists.torproject.org > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
