I'm not sure if reporting is off or something isn't configured right or 
whatever it could be, but when running nyx, it is telling me that the measured 
rate is 229.0 B/s which to me, sounds ridiculously slow. Where is it getting 
the measured rate from? Is it a calculation on how much data is passing in a 
given time or some sort of speed test from another relay or where? While I've 
used Tor off and on for several years, I never ran a relay until now and I'm 
still not certain on several aspects, though I keep digging to make sure I can 
supply the best exit relays I can. (I currently host 2 exit relays and hope to 
bring up 3 more in the near future if I can find hardware to run them on. 
Though I may make one a bridge.)

I have some spare internet connections that are provided to us that are 25/5 
connections. I configured torrc with a 500KB/s limit with 600KB/s bursting as 
this should work nicely to use ~4Mbps of the 5Mbps that the connection supports 
and allows me some bandwidth to be able to connect to the machines for 
monitoring and troubleshooting as well as more than enough bandwidth for 
downloading updates and such.

The line in nyx that I'm referring to is:
Bandwidth (limit: 500 KB/s, burst: 600 KB/s, measured: 229.0 B/s):
Where is it getting that 229.0 B/s rate and is there anything I can do to get 
it closer to the 500KB/s I am trying to share.

Granted, I am using a Linksys e1200 and Belkin something-or-other that I can't 
remember off the top of my head running DD-WRT as routers in front of the 
servers. (I've pondered removing the router and just connecting the server 
directly to the internet and relying on pf for my firewalling, but I can't do 
that at the one location as I also have a couple other things connected to it. 
Both routers are higher end consumer routers with 32MB of RAM and has 32768 for 
maximum ports. (Currently just under 3000 active IP connections as I'm typing 
this e-mail.) I might just try this on my one exit to see if this is the 
bottleneck I'm hitting or if there's something else affecting it.

When I had first put this in place, I was using an older Netgear ProVPN router 
of some sort, but I swapped it out due to it flagging NTP traffic as unknown 
even though my server was initiating the NTP requests. But I was maintaining 
200KB/s+ connections fairly consistently. It now ranges all over the place and 
I'm not sure if that's an issue on my end or just part of the lifecycle of a 
relay.

I just recently rebooted the machine this happened to pop up in the nyx log 
window as I was looking at this:
12:33:09 [NOTICE] Heartbeat: Tor's uptime is 4 days 23:59 hours, with 1928 
circuits open. I've sent 37.89 GB and received 37.00 GB.
To me, that seems a too low, but I've not sat down to do the math and maybe 
that's a good statistic for 5 days at 4Mbps.

I'd appreciate any tips and pointers you can send my way. And if the consumer 
routers are the issue, I can move my one exit relay to one of the other 
connections I have and not use it at the location (or just run one that's 
slower) where I do use this backup internet connection. (It's handy to have a 
network that's not part of our internal network for testing.)

Thanks for sticking with me through this whole e-mail and I apologize for 
rambling and jumping around a bit. I'm sure I left out some stuff and didn't 
clarify something else or something wasn't clear, so if you need more 
information, just ask.

Thank you,
John


Penn Cambria School District

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
only for the person or entity to which it is addressed. If you have received 
this email in error, please notify the sender immediately via email and delete 
this email along with any attachments from your system. Any unauthorized or 
improper disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this 
e-mail and attached documents is strictly prohibited. The views and opinions of 
this email or attachments are reflections of the author and are not necessarily 
the views and opinions of Penn Cambria School District. We do not accept 
responsibility or liability for any loss or damage from the receipt of this 
email, its use, or for any errors or omissions.

www.pcam.org<http://www.pcam.org>

_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Reply via email to