On 2/5/19, Roman Mamedov <r...@romanrm.net> wrote: >> Nicknames are required to be non-empty, did that stop any abuse?
> Correction: Nicknames default to "Unnamed" when unset. > However did any of the recent abuse or suspected-malicious relays actually > use "Unnamed"? The consensus contains quite some fraction of unnamed, naturally some of which have been noted by various people as suspicious to in fact malicious. Do nicknames or contacts fields stop anything, surely no guarantee there, but they might help resolve issues as they arise. And if nicknames go away (status on that proposal), then contact is likely to absorb that function, including the current always present nature of nickname. _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
