Hi, > On 22 Sep 2019, at 16:40, Felix <zwie...@quantentunnel.de> wrote: > > > Am 2019-09-21 um 4:11 PM schrieb Toralf Förster: >> On 9/16/19 9:19 PM, Felix wrote: >>> >>> The sbws bandwidth authorities now can measure the bandwidth of the relay. >>> >>> Can somebody confirm my observation or has prove (please no speculations). >>> >> >> I upgraded LibreSSL from 2.9.2 to 3.0.0 here at a stable Gentoo Linux >> and got immediately from all IPv6 capable BW authorties the >> "ReachableIPv6" flag back at both affected relays. > > I have different ssl library setups on the same server (Freebsd): > > sbws measurement is working now for Openssl102s/t, Openssl111d and > Libressl 300. > > sbws measurement is _not_ working now for Libressl 292.
sbws is just a normal tor client, with a custom controller. We need some more information to diagnose the issue, and answer these questions: * Is this issue reproducible? * Are all tor clients affected? * If only some tor clients are affected, why are they affected? * Are all bandwidth authorities affected, or just the ones running sbws? * Are these issues actually instances of know sbws bugs? > On 26 Aug 2019, at 11:14, teor <t...@riseup.net> wrote: > > There are 3 high-priority bugs that make sbws leave some useful relays out > of its bandwidth file: > https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/query?status=!closed&keywords=~sbws-majority-blocker T
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays