That's the one I meant, thanks. William
2021-03-08 19:08 GMT, Eddie <stun...@attglobal.net>: > As well as the keys, be sure to also move/copy the pt_state folder and > contents. > > Cheers. > > > On 3/8/2021 8:07 AM, William Kane wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Every bridge is useful, and a possible chance for a tor user to >> circumvent censorship, you can't possibly know which bridges are >> already blocked for a user, so every bridge in the network counts - >> looking at your graphs, on average 50 people are connected to it, >> compared to other bridges, that's a lot of users - if you move your >> bridge, make sure to keep / back up the private signing keys, the >> bridge related data (it's a separate folder inside the DataDirectory) >> and if possible, the IP address it's running under, if you lose either >> of them, you will lose all your clients which trust and possibly rely >> on you, the bridge operator, to continue operations. >> >> More information on moving tor nodes can be found here: >> https://2019.www.torproject.org/docs/faq.html.en#UpgradeOrMove >> >> Regards, >> William >> >> 2021-03-07 10:35 GMT, a tor op <ato...@protonmail.ch>: >>> Hello >>> >>> I was thinking of perhaps asking and checking if the list has some >>> comments >>> on thoughts I have. >>> >>> I'm attaching a picture, hope that's not a problem, guess it's better >>> than >>> providing a URL to a file upload place (or maybe that's ok too?). >>> >>> I've been running a TOR bridge node for some years and need to >>> rebuild/move >>> it. >>> >>> For some time I wasn't sure how useful it was, whether or not it >>> contributed >>> in a useful way and I don't think it still has all the flags it >>> could/should >>> have? >>> >>> So, for you around here with an even deeper experience of the network, >>> looking at the stats, are there any particular insights that can be >>> drawn >>> from there? Is it a useful bridge, stats that could or should look >>> differently, anything else? >>> >>> BTW, there's a huge spike in connections on 9 Aug -20 (and there's been >>> similar occasions earlier too) does that coincide with known attacks on >>> the >>> network or what? >>> >>> I guess, should I want to continue providing service, that it's useful >>> or >>> possibly preferred to move over the keys/config (?) to indicate same >>> admin >>> (and for users if there's no noticeable interruption the move won't even >>> be >>> noticed I suppose). >>> >>> >>> TIA, >>> a tor op >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> tor-relays mailing list >> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org >> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> This e-mail was checked for spam by the freeware edition of CleanMail. >> The freeware edition is restricted to personal and non-commercial use. >> You can remove this notice by purchasing a commercial license: >> http://antispam.byteplant.com/products/cleanmail/index.html > > _______________________________________________ > tor-relays mailing list > tor-relays@lists.torproject.org > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays > _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays