Georg,
Yes! That is precisely it!
Please know that the change appears to be working with my loadbalanced Tor
Relay deployment as well.
Are there any "Issues" submitted for a similar change to Concensus Weight and
Relay Probability to Tor Metrics on Onionoo? It appears these values are still
only being reported for a Single Tor Node.
A BIG Thank You to the Tor Metrics Team for the Issue-40022 implementation.
Respectfully,
Gary—
This Message Originated by the Sun.
iBigBlue 63W Solar Array (~12 Hour Charge)
+ 2 x Charmast 26800mAh Power Banks
= iPhone XS Max 512GB (~2 Weeks Charged)
On Thursday, March 3, 2022, 1:28:12 PM MST, Georg Koppen
<g...@torproject.org> wrote:
Gary C. New via tor-relays:
> David,
> Has Tor Metrics implemented your RFC related to Written Bytes per Second and
> Read Bytes per Second on Onionoo?
That's probably
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/network-health/metrics/onionoo/-/issues/40022
, no?
Georg
> As of the 27th of February, I've noticed a change in reporting that
> accurately reflects the aggregate of my Tor Relay Nodes opposed to the
> previously reported Single Tor Node. Are you seeing a similar change for
> snowflake.torproject.org?
> Additionally, other than the hourly stacktrace errors in the syslog, the
> secure_onion_key workaround seems to be working well without any ill
> side-effects. I've been able to operate with the same secure_onion_key for
> close to 5 weeks, now. Have you run into any issues?
> Thank you for your response.
> Respectfully,
>
> Gary—
> This Message Originated by the Sun.
> iBigBlue 63W Solar Array (~12 Hour Charge)
> + 2 x Charmast 26800mAh Power Banks
> = iPhone XS Max 512GB (~2 Weeks Charged)
>
> On Tuesday, February 8, 2022, 11:49:47 PM MST, Gary C. New via
>tor-relays <tor-relays@lists.torproject.org> wrote:
>
> David,
> Excellent Documentation and References!
> I hope the proposed RFC's (auth, key, and metrics) for loadbalanced Tor
> topologies are seriously considered and implemented by Tor Core and Tor
> Metrics.
> Great Work!
> Respectfully,
>
> Gary—
> This Message Originated by the Sun.
> iBigBlue 63W Solar Array (~12 Hour Charge)
> + 2 x Charmast 26800mAh Power Banks
> = iPhone XS Max 512GB (~2 Weeks Charged)
>
> On Tuesday, February 8, 2022, 10:02:53 AM MST, David Fifield
><da...@bamsoftware.com> wrote:
>
> The load-balanced Snowflake bridge is running in production since
> 2022-01-31. Thanks Roger, Gary, Roman for your input.
>
> Hopefully reproducible installation instructions:
>
>https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/anti-censorship/team/-/wikis/Survival-Guides/Snowflake-Bridge-Installation-Guide?version_id=6de6facbb0fd047de978a561213c59224511445f
> Observations since:
>
>https://bugs.torproject.org/tpo/anti-censorship/pluggable-transports/snowflake/40095#note_2774428
>
> Metrics graphs are currently confused by multiple instances of tor
> uploading descriptors under the same fingerprint. Particularly in the
> interval between 2022-01-25 and 2022-02-03, when a production bridge and
> staging bridge were running in parallel, with four instances being used
> and another four being mostly unused.
>
>https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/5481936581E23D2D178105D44DB6915AB06BFB7F
>
>https://metrics.torproject.org/userstats-bridge-transport.html?start=2021-11-10&end=2022-02-08&transport=snowflake
> Since 2022-02-03, it appears that Metrics is showing only one of the
> four running instances per day. Because all four instances are about
> equally used (as if load balanced, go figure), the values on the graph
> are 1/4 what they should be. The reported bandwidth of 5 MB/s is
> actually 20 MB/s, and the 2500 clients are actually 10000. All the
> necessary data are present in Collector, it's just a question of data
> processing. I opened an issue for the Metrics graphs, where you can also
> see some manually made graphs that are closer to the true values.
> https://bugs.torproject.org/tpo/network-health/metrics/onionoo/40022
>
> I started a thread on tor-dev about the issues of onion key rotation and
> ExtORPort authentication.
> https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/2022-February/thread.html
> _______________________________________________
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
> _______________________________________________
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
