Hi, As I'm sure you've already gathered, your system is maxing out trying to deal with all the connection requests. When inet_csk_get_port is called and the port is found to be occupied then inet_csk_bind_conflict is called to resolve the conflict. So in normal circumstances you shouldn't see it in perf top much less at 79%. There are two ways to deal with it, and each method should be complimented by the other. One way is to try to increase the number of ports and reduce the wait time which you have somehow tried. I would add the following:
net.ipv4.tcp_fin_timeout = 20 net.ipv4.tcp_max_tw_buckets = 1200 net.ipv4.tcp_keepalive_time = 1200 net.ipv4.tcp_syncookies = 1 net.ipv4.tcp_max_syn_backlog = 8192 The complimentary method to the above is to lower the number of connection requests by removing the frivolous connection requests out of the equation using a few iptables rules. I'm assuming the increased load you're experiencing is due to the current DDos attacks and I'm not sure if you're using anything to mitigate that but you should consider it. You may find something useful at the following links [1](https://github.com/Enkidu-6/tor-ddos) [2](https://github.com/toralf/torutils) [background](https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/community/support/-/issues/40093) Cheers. On 12/1/2022 3:35 PM, Christopher Sheats wrote: > Hello tor-relays, > > We are using Ubuntu server currently for our exit relays. > Occasionally, exit throughput will drop from ~4Gbps down to ~200Mbps > and the only observable data point that we have is a significant > increase in inet_csk_bind_conflict, as seen via 'perf top', where it > will hit 85% [kernel] utilization. > > A while back we thought we solved with with two /etc/sysctl.conf settings: > net.ipv4.ip_local_port_range = 1024 65535 > net.ipv4.tcp_tw_reuse = 1 > > However we are still experiencing this problem. > > Both of our (currently, two) relay servers suffer from the same > problem, at the same time. They are AMD Epyc 7402P bare-metal servers > each with 96GB RAM, each has 20 exit relays on them. This issue > persists after upgrading to 0.4.7.11. > > Screenshots of perf top are shared > here: https://digitalcourage.social/@EmeraldOnion/109440197076214023 > > Does anyone have experience troubleshooting and/or fixing this problem? > > Cheers, > > -- > Christopher Sheats (yawnbox) > Executive Director > Emerald Onion > Signal: +1 206.739.3390 > Website: https://emeraldonion.org/ > Mastodon: https://digitalcourage.social/@EmeraldOnion/ > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > tor-relays mailing list > tor-relays@lists.torproject.org > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays