On 11/06/2011 09:13 AM, Moritz Bartl wrote: > I agree with Fabio on this one. A website explaining the badge should > also mention the controversy and offer simple guides for local badge > generation. You could also promote other sources for the badge, ie. the > CCC and Torservers could host one. >
I guess? I think it's good to discuss the issues in the open but I think it's overwhelming to average users. Offer it as a simple service, explain the risk, make it easy to use, etc. > As for badge design, a script should support multiple designs (could be > as easy as to drop images into a directory, and use a GET/POST parameter > to select the images). Personally, I would like to see something as > simple as the Torbutton "broken onion" (no text), one at 88x33 and one > at 80x15. > I like the idea of everything being in a single script - to prevent hot linking that falsely suggests someone is using Tor... > Another paragraph should mention that it only compares your IP to a list > of exit IPs, so it can lead to false positives if you happen to use the > same IP for other purposes. The website should also clearly discourage that. > Seems reasonable. Already too complicated. All the best, Jacob _______________________________________________ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk