So are you telling me that standard Firefox depends on closed source binaries as well? I don't care about how free the license is. I'm talking about whether it can be built completely from source code.
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Koh Choon Lin <2choon...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi > > On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 1:04 AM, AK <aka...@gmail.com> wrote: > > As far as I know, Aurora is based on something called "Firefox Portable". > > Last time I checked, this thing isn't even open source. Can someone > clarify > > this? Or should I open a new thread? > > Aurora is a brand-less version of Firefox. It is considered to be more > free than the Firefox binaries from Mozilla and is tri-licensed too. > Portable app is a method of modifying a product (Firefox) into one > which does not leave any trace on the running PC. > > > > -- > Regards > Koh Choon Lin > _______________________________________________ > tor-talk mailing list > tor-talk@lists.torproject.org > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk > _______________________________________________ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk