>
>I recognize that free speech means free speech for everyone, even those
>with views that we find objectionable, but there's nothing to stop the
>community from turning a cold shoulder to these people who see informed
>consent as being an optional or academic concept.


        Public relations, yes. I think the Tor community needs to strenghten 
its ties with big American firms like, say, Google, and especially with the 
American military. Tor people can stress the fact that Tor is used by the 
American military and that it helps them murder any kind of deviants who resist 
American rule (for instance, muslims).


        Now, I see that you are concerned about "informed consent". I'm 
wondering if you are then campaigning against so called social security, public 
education, taxes, and ultimately the state itself? I mean, if you're really 
worried about 'consent'...

        But maybe you are working on a more limited scope now, and you just 
want to stop parents indoctrinating 'their' children with religious garbage? 
Surely children are not giving "informed consent" when subjected to religious 
brainwashing...



J.
        


        





        





>Just my $.02
>
>Thanks,
>-Chris
>
>
>-- 
>Christopher Patti - Geek At Large | GTalk: cpa...@gmail.com | AIM:
>chrisfeohpatti | P: (260) 54PATTI
>"Technology challenges art, art inspires technology." - John Lasseter,
>Pixar
>_______________________________________________
>tor-talk mailing list
>tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
>https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk 

_______________________________________________
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

Reply via email to