Thanks Lodewijk. Do you know how to sandbox and make it work reliably?
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 8:22 PM, Lodewijk andré de la porte <[email protected]>wrote: > 2013/5/17 Griffin Boyce <[email protected]> > > > Flash isn't even as useful as current alternatives (webm <video>). > > You could make the case that Flash allows for amazing video games, but > > that seems like the perfect use-case for high-throughput/low-lag VPNs. > > > > I don't want to extend a discussion about Flash too much. But with WebGL > HTML5 is up and beyond Flash in terms of potential for games. > > There will always remain Flash dependent webpages. And I'm talking about > those build-completely-in-flash websites. I've even experienced a ton of > Korean websites that require you to install COM objects, activate ActiveX > in IE, require you to install some file from a .exe, or all of the above. > > Just forget about it, it's not worth the effort. Users should complain and > reject too non-standard webpages so much that they'll stop being developed, > that's the only way to really fix this. > > The easiest way now would be sandboxing and manually approving every > network request. The other ways are experimental, circumstantial and > exceedingly hard to program. > _______________________________________________ > tor-talk mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk > _______________________________________________ tor-talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
