30.08.2013 Juan Garofalo: > At 02:16 AM 8/30/2013 -0700, you wrote: >> Juan Garofalo: >>> At 02:14 PM 8/29/2013 -0700, you wrote: >>>> This conversation is a little tired. >>>> >>>> The tinfoil hats are going to see any funding of Tor by the US >>>> government as evidence that Tor is really a front for it and/or >>>> pwned by it. >>> >>> So if facts can't be denied, and basic principles of politics and >>> economic 'incentives' can't be denied, the best course of action >>> is to call any critics "tin foil hats". >>> >>> I get it. It's a very amazing...non-argument. >> >> Seriously? > > Seriously what? You don't understand that baseless name calling shows > that you don't have a leg to stand on?
"Why are your words shaped so strangely?" (I should say lines, but that's a quote) >> How long have you been on this list? > > Check your logs. > > How long have you been studying political theory and history? > "Are you okay?" > >> We discuss methods of subverting the NSA/GPA/key theft adversary >> every time it comes up here. It turns out this is actually a hard >> problem. It also turns out we're not doing *that* bad. > > > I didn't make any comment about any particular technical issue. Indeed, there was no source for any issue whatsoever. >> Unless of course you believe that all the leaks through Tor were >> sanctioned and/or orchestrated by the military industrial complex. > > What are you talking about? > >> In which case, can I just say "Scoreboard, plz?" I think I can >> still say that here. We'll see... Avenge my death? ;) >> >> Anyway, I would ask that you attempt at least one of the following: >> >> >> 1. Respect our efforts on this front. We're doing our best with >> what we have 2. Provide citations to support your conspiracy >> theories of Tor's subversion > > Tor is funded by the US government. Your own sources. Indeed, it is. > Tor doesn't work against a 'global adversary'(that is the US > government). Your own sources. Note quite global, but at important places. Not sure how fine-grained it is. > Biggest 'hidden' server on the network apparently taken down...by the > US government. As it seems this was not the fault of the 'hidden service system', most likely one hidden-service failed due to the software that was used, which lead to the takedown of all hidden-services affiliated with the one that failed. > But you know what? I never said tor was 'subverted' by the US > government. Tor isn't 'subverted' - it just flawed...by design. Fair enough, if that's what you believe, then please make your own thing. Create something better than Tor. > >> 3. Find better meds 4. Go fuck off "Baby, did you forget to take your meds?" > > Uh oh. > End, Sebastian G. -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsusbscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk