You are hard to follow. Dont get rid of me yet ok? I'm not ready to go, Julie Chartier On Jan 26, 2014 8:45 PM, "Katya Titov" <katti...@yandex.com> wrote:
> Rick: > > Why should you be stuck with anything? You're writing an important > > piece for an important project: You know... the onion with the crown? > > What you're writing may well become a source, a reference. You drive > > the conversation. All the words are belong to you. :) > > > > In a very broad sense I'd suggest: > > > > 'Commercial' that is open to all (sort of) and is after whatever can > > be monetized. > > > > 'Private' that is behind all those heavy-metal firewalls and exists > > primarily in support of 'commercial'. > > > > 'Neutral' for those referred to as 'deep' or 'dark' and, like Tor, > > seek to be common carriers:Identity is by choice, not by mandate. The > > connotations of the word 'neutral' are benign. It also suggests 'net > > neutrality' (original recipe... not KFCC's extra-crispy). Further, > > 'Neutral Net' has a nice ring to it. Shorten that to 'NeuNet' and the > > media might run with the concept. They love that stuff; it makes the > > Pulitzer fairies run around in their heads. > > Thanks Rick, for the encouragement and the suggestions. I've added a > few definitions ('Open Internet' to represent your 'Commercial', as well > as a 'Private network'), but I've left the dark web as is ... not sure > that 'Neutral' fits, but I will keep it in mind. > -- > kat > -- > tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org > To unsubscribe or change other settings go to > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk > -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk