On Sun, 29 Jun 2014 08:31:20 -0400
Roger Dingledine <a...@mit.edu> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 12:19:56PM +0100, Mark McCarron wrote:
> > Given the scale of this obviousness, I can only assume that you're a
> >sock puppet for an intelligence agency who has started to panic about
> >the network going truly dark.
> >
> > Deal with it.
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> I've tried to tolerate the conspiracy theories / trolling here, since
> there are legitimate worries to be had about what attacks various
> adversaries may have come up with, even if the way you're expressing
> them isn't winning you many friends. But ad hominem attacks are not
> appropriate for this list, and they will get you removed from it if
@ Mark
Looks like my case has finally and completely been made
for me, by Roger.
You´ve been officially threatened by one of the ´leaders´ of the
´tor family´ for (unlike me) politely point out tor´s obvious
flaws.
As a side note, I am suprised at the blatant contradicion
Roger : ¨I've tried to tolerate the conspiracy theories /
trolling here¨ <-- thats a 100% chemically pure ´ad hominem´
and then
¨But ad hominem attacks are not appropriate for this list¨
I rest my case...though I´ll throw a bit more evidence in =P
¨Mick¨ wrote ¨Personally I shy away from feeding trolls.¨
<--name calling/ad hominen.
¨zeenan¨ wrote ¨I suggest you save some dignity and
demonstrate a genuine attempt to contribute meaningfully in any way.¨
That line ^^^^^^ looks pretty insulting to me.
And you also got an anonymous lunatic rant/attack from
antispa...@sent.at (that was from a tor zealot who is really
pissed off, it seems)
J.
> they persist.
>
> Thanks,
> --Roger
>
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
