On 06/30/2014 12:29 AM, grarpamp wrote: >> McMark wrote: >> I have been examining the number of what would normally be deemed as illegal >> sites sites on Tor. > > Even though I take certain issues with it, particularly the call to cease > development of anonymity platforms, a more formal examination is here: > > “A Review of the Available Content on Tor Hidden Services: The Case > Against Further Development,” > Computers in Human Behavior, no. 29 (6):2805-2815, 2013. Clement Guitton. > > http://bayfiles.net/file/1gSsw/myJCs7/tor_hs_content-guitton.pdf
Guitton states: "The advantages of anonymity to store and access this ethical content do not balance the negative impacts caused by the unethical content. Freedom of expression and the lack of censorship, if theoretically praiseworthy, are overshadowed by what users have done with it: using Tor hidden services in unethical ways." Who gets to define "ethical"? -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk