On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 04:41:30PM -0300, Juan wrote: > On Tue, 1 Jul 2014 14:36:08 -0400 > Paul Syverson <paul.syver...@nrl.navy.mil> wrote: > [snip] > > >It's hard to imagine what would satisfy you at this point but > > perhaps this will help: I designed Tor with Roger and Nick. At all > > times we designed it to be as secure as we could given usability, > > performance, and other practicality goals (which are themselves > > security goals we considered, as has also been widely documented). At > > no point did we intentionally do anything to make the design less > > secure than we could think how to do while still making it as usable > > and practical as possible. > > > You do realize that given the politics of the US government > your claims are pretty shaky, no ? You are to be oh so > trusted...because you say so? Come on. >
In keeping with the explicit goals and assumptions of Tor: No, I don't think I should be taken at my word. I think people should instead rely on the extraordinary evidence of the most well-documented, scrutinized, and open system in existence. I wouldn't have bothered to claim anything except that Mark explicitly said, "I don't see anyone denying it. Do you?" As I noted, I did see that others already had. But since he didn't seem to, and as a designer of Tor, I explicitly and directly answered him. Believe me or not as you wish. aloha, Paul -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk